MAEZ advisory
Using a chartered risk lens to close Chain of Responsibility gaps
How MAEZ combines chartered risk thinking, HVNL knowledge, WHS alignment and CoRGuard implementation pathways to close practical compliance gaps.
Chain of Responsibility consultingchartered risk transporttransport compliance consulting Australia
Published 3 June 2026/Chartered risk and CoR consulting
Risk language has to become operational
A Chain of Responsibility gap review should not stop at generic risk statements. It should identify who controls the activity, what can go wrong, what control exists, what evidence proves it, and what follow-up happens when the control fails.
What MAEZ reviews
- Duty holder mapping
- Training coverage and competency records
- HVNL and WHS overlap
- Vehicle, fatigue, contractor and document controls
- Incident, NCR, hazard and corrective-action evidence
- Executive review and reporting
From review to implementation
The advisory path can lead into CoRGuard when the business needs a system for alerts, documents, evidence, workflow and management review. That keeps MAEZ positioned as the expert upsell and CoRGuard as the implementation layer.
Frequently asked questions
Practical answers
- What is a CoR gap review?
- It is a practical review of duties, controls, evidence, training and follow-up across the transport task.
- Why use a risk lens?
- A risk lens helps prioritise the gaps that could lead to harm, enforcement, audit failure or business disruption.
- Does software replace advisory work?
- No. Software supports evidence and workflow. MAEZ advisory work helps decide what controls are needed and why.